Resultado de búsqueda
7 de nov. de 2014 · Hace alrededor de quince años que dos de los economistas más importantes del siglo veinte –Richard Musgrave y James Buchanan- se reunieron durante una semana en la Universidad de Múnich para discutir, frente a colegas de diversas partes de Europa y Estados Unidos, sus visiones sobre el rol del Estado en la economía.
29 de jul. de 2014 · This paper assesses James M. Buchanan's claim of following a positive approach in stark contrast to the normative approach to public finance of Richard A. Musgrave. The goal of this paper is to shed light on the foundations of modern American public finance by analysing one aspect of the methodology of its two most prominent fathers.
ISBN electronic: 9780262269476. Publication date: 1999. In this volume, based on a week-long symposium at the University of Munich's Center for Economic Studies, two leading scholars of governmental economics debate their divergent perspectives on the role of government and its fiscal functions.
23 de sept. de 2013 · View PDF. This paper assesses James M. Buchanan's claim of following a positive approach in stark contrast to the normative approach to public finance of Richard A. Musgrave. The goal of this paper is to shed light on the foundations of modern American.
El presente artículo tiene por objeto el análisis de la teoría constitucional del Premio Nobel de Economía James M. Buchanan a través de la exégesis de sus princi-pales aportes doctrinales, desgranando aquellos principios que revisten interés para la doctrina constitucional y que pueden servir de fundamento teórico a la constitucio-nalización de...
James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock were the first to discuss what had been the traditional domain of political scientists within the realm of economic theory. They did so by considering government decisionmaking not as a monolith, but rather as representing a spectrum of interests.
The book’s discussion points to two different sources of their differing views. First, as Buchanan (p. 88) points out, Musgrave places more trust in the state than Buchanan. Second, Buchanan and Musgrave have two different visions of the functions of the state.
