Resultado de búsqueda
PAULINE KAEL Circles and Squares In 1957, in the Paris monthly "Cahiers du Cinema Frangois99 Truffaut proposed for the magazine a "politique des auteurs"—a policy of focussing criticism primarily upon directors, and specifically upon certain chosen directors whose individuality of style qualified them, in the eyes of the Cahiers "team" as
Circles and Squaresby Pauline Kael (1919-2001) [A critique of the 'auteur theory']Film Quarterly, Vol. 16, No. 3Spring, 1963https://the.hitchcock.zone/files/m...
Details. article: Circles and Squares. author (s): Pauline Kael. journal: Film Quarterly (01/Apr/1963) issue: volume 16, issue 3, pages 12-26. DOI: 10.1525/fq.1963.16.3.04a00040. journal ISSN: 0015-1386. publisher: University of California Press.
14 de nov. de 2020 · She had made her name with a 1963 piece, “Circles and Squares,” savaging the film critic Andrew Sarris and other proponents of the “auteur theory,” which emphasized the primacy of ...
24 de jun. de 2009 · June 24, 2009. While I was out, the reader Driedchar posted a fascinating comment regarding our recent discussion of Pauline Kael and her famous essay against Andrew Sarris and the “auteur...
Pauline Kael was the first serious critic of the auteur theory. Without question, her famously acerbic 1963 response to Sarris continues to raise important questions about the theory’s persuasiveness, questions taken up and elaborated by many other critics and scholars since the early 1960s.
She wrote a number of memorable pieces earlier in her career, notably Circles and Squares, an attack on what she saw as the absurdities of the auteur theory. It made quite a stir and permanently alienated Andrew Sarris and a number of other critics, foreshadowing the numerous enemies she would continue to make both inside and outside the industry.