Resultado de búsqueda
1. For hypothetical situations: - "If he were you, he would take the opportunity." (third-person singular subject) - "If we were you, we would reconsider the offer." (first-person plural subject) 2. For different verb tenses: - "If she had been you, she would have made a different decision
A. Take. B. Took. C. Had taken. D. Takes. How to use : Read the question carefully, then select one of the answers button. About grammarquiz.net. GrammarQuiz.Net - Improve your knowledge of English grammar, the best way to kill your free time. If I _______ you, I would take that job offer. A. were B. am C. will be - Conditional Sentences Quiz.
But when we are giving advice, we always use if I were you (NOT was). If he was/were rich, he wouldn’t be living in this house. If I were you, I’d call him as soon as possible. (NOT was) As with all conditional types, we use a comma after the if clause when it goes at the beginning of the sentence, but we don’t use a comma when the if ...
2 I would be happier if I 'yes' when she asked me to marry her. 3 If you weren't such a jerk, they you to yesterday's party. 4 If you a map, as I told you, we wouldn't be lost now. 5 If I didn't love you, I you last year. 6 If I had more time, I you last night. 7 If you that job, you would be miserable now. 8 I'm afraid of flying.
7 de ago. de 2013 · “If I offered you the job, would you say yes?” “I’m very interested and I’ll most likely accept, if the offer is competitive.” In other words, positive without making a definite commitment.
If I see Sara, I’ ll tell her to call you. (=possible) If I won the lottery, I’ d buy a new house. (=unrealistic) Sometimes, we use either the first or second conditional depending on how probable we think the situations are to happen. If I find her, I’ll tell her that I love her. (=I think it’s possible that I find her)
29 de abr. de 2019 · Did I say I would take the job, even if it were offered? = No, I did not say I would take the job, even if it were offered! So, knowing that your original question is rhetorical, it can be converted into a more direct assertion using the same rule:
