Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 22 de abr. de 2013 · Three botanists - Hugo DeVries, Carl Correns and Erich von Tschermak - independently rediscovered Mendel's work in the same year, a generation after Mendel published his papers. They helped expand awareness of the Mendelian laws of inheritance in the scientific world.

    • Mitosis Observed

      1879: Mitosis observed. Walter Flemming described chromosome...

  2. Hugo Marie de Vries ForMemRS [1] (16 de febrero de 1848 - 21 de mayo de 1935) fue un botánico neerlandés y uno de los primeros genetistas. Nacido en Haarlem y fallecido en Lunteren , es uno de los tres biólogos (los otros fueron Carl Correns y Erich von Tschermak ) que en 1900 redescubrieron las leyes fundamentales de la genética publicadas ...

  3. 15 de oct. de 2007 · Fueron destacados botánicos de principios del siglo XX: Hugo de Vries (Holanda), Carl Correns (Alemania) y Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg (Austria). Es discutible si hubiera sido posible que comprendieran sus propios resultados sin haber leído con anterioridad el trabajo de Mendel.

  4. Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns and Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg were the three scientists who rediscovered Mendel's laws in 1900. They were all working independently on different plant hybrids, and came to the same conclusions about inheritance as Mendel.

  5. 1 de oct. de 2000 · Then, like several claps of thunder, came announcements of the rediscovery of Mendel's laws of heredity by three botanists — Hugo de Vries in Holland 2, Carl Correns in Germany 3 and Eric...

  6. Hugo de Vries, Carl Correns and Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg were the three scientists who rediscovered Mendel's laws in 1900. They were all working independently on different plant hybrids, and came to the same conclusions about inheritance as Mendel.

  7. His work then went largely unnoticed for the next 34 years before its rediscovery by three independent researchersHugo de Vries, Carl Correns, and Erich von Tschermak—in 1900 ( Bateson 1900). However, as soon as the work was rediscovered, it created controversy ( e.g., Weldon 1902).