Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Hace 16 horas · Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has recently criticized those opposing an increase in Bitcoin’s block size. He bases his arguments on two books that examine the “Bitcoin block size war” from contrasting viewpoints. Jonathan Bier’s The Blocksize War supports small blocks, whereas Roger Ver and Steve Patterson’s Hijacking Bitcoin ...

  2. Hace 16 horas · En una publicación de blog que invita a la reflexión, el fundador de Ethereum, Vitalik Buterin, profundiza en la polémica guerra del tamaño de los bloques de Saltar al contenido CriptoNoticias

  3. Hace 1 hora · Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, has provided a detailed reflection on the Bitcoin block size wars, a significant conflict within the Bitcoin community that spanned from 2015 to 2017. This debate centered on whether to increase Bitcoin’s block size limit from 1 MB to accommodate more transactions, thereby reducing fees and enhancing its utility as a payment system.

  4. Hace 16 horas · Joseph Lubin, Ethereum co-founder, praises fellow co-founder Vitalik Buterin's crucial contributions to the project during a podcast interview. In discussions at Berlin's Safe{Con}, Lucas Schor, CEO of Safe Wallet, highlights Buterin's influences on Ethereum's ecosystem and technical development, notably his Ethereum Improvement Proposal (EIP) 7702.

  5. Hace 52 minutos · Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum (CRYPTO:ETH), has reflected on the Bitcoin (CRYPTO:BTC) block size wars from 2015 to 2017, highlighting its impact on Bitcoin's future and Ethereum's governance. Buterin sided with the "big blockers" who wanted larger blocks to keep transaction fees low but ...

  6. Hace 5 horas · Ethereum fue creada en 2015 por el programador Vitalik Buterin, con la intención de impulsar una herramienta para aplicaciones descentralizadas y colaborativas Por Armando Montes 31 May, 2024 05: ...

  7. Hace 5 horas · Vitalik Buterin introduced the concept of a "one-sided competence trap," where one side of a debate monopolizes technical competence, using it to push a narrow agenda. Meanwhile, the opposition, though correct on the fundamental issue, fails to develop the necessary competence to execute their vision.