Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 30 de jun. de 1984 · Summary: It can be rational to believe something without "proof"; we all do it all the time. In measuring whether belief in God qualifies as rational, this book shows compellingly that belief in God is properly basic; i.e., it needs no general justification.

  2. www.princeton.edu › ~hhalvors › restrictedPrinceton University

    Created Date: 4/25/2008 9:09:34 AM

  3. 12 de jun. de 2014 · 1. The Goals of Theistic Arguments. 2. History of Moral Arguments for Gods Existence. 3. Theoretical Moral Arguments for Gods Existence and Divine Command Theories of Moral Obligation. 4. Arguments from Moral Knowledge or Awareness. 5. Arguments from Human Dignity or Worth. 6. Practical Moral Arguments for Belief in God. 7. Conclusion.

  4. Plantinga's "Reason and Belief in God" amplifies almost everything he has written on evidentialism over the last seven years. Many charge that belief in God is irrational because there is insufficient evidence for it.

  5. 8 de ene. de 2010 · How Real People Believe: Reason and Belief in God. Kelly James Clark. Book Editor (s): Melville Y. Stewart. First published: 08 January 2010. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444317350.ch37. PDF. Tools. Share. Summary. This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction. The Demand for Evidence. Belief Begins with Trust.

  6. More specifically, Plantinga argues that belief in God is properly basic, and due to a religious externalist epistemology, he claims that it could be justified independently of evidence. His externalist epistemology, called "proper functionalism", is a form of epistemological reliabilism .

  7. 16 de ago. de 2004 · Socrates’ argument is an argument for the permissibility of a certain belief, based on the benefits of believing that certain belief. Pragmatic arguments are practical in orientation, justifying actions that are thought to facilitate the achievement of our goals, or the satisfaction of our desires.