Resultado de búsqueda
Abstract. LEIBNIZ AND THE TWO SOPHIES is a critical edition of all of the philosophically important material from the correspondence between the philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) and his two royal patronesses, Electress Sophie of Hanover (1630-1714), and her daughter, Queen Sophie Charlotte of Prussia (1668-1705).
- LEIBNIZ AND THE TWO SOPHIES
Leibniz and the two Sophies [electronic resource] : the...
- LEIBNIZ AND THE TWO SOPHIES
29 de jul. de 2011 · Reviewed by Irena Backus, University of Geneva. 2011.07.29. This is an English translation (very largely from the French) of what the editor has termed philosophical correspondence between Leibniz and his patron, Electress Sophie of Hanover (1630-1714) and the latter's daughter, Queen Sophie Charlotte of Prussia (1668-1705).
Leibniz and the Two Sophies is primarily a selection from the correspondence between Leibniz and Sophie, Electress of Hanover (1630-1714) and the corre-spondence between Leibniz and Sophie’s daughter, Queen Sophie Charlotte of Prus-sia (1668-1705). The volume follows on the back of Lloyd Strickland’s The Shorter Leibniz Texts (Continuum ...
View PDF. Leibniz and The Two Sophies: The Philosophical Correspondence. 2011 •. Lloyd Strickland. A critical edition of all of the philosophically important material from the correspondence between the philosopher Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz (1646-1716) and his two royal patronesses, Electress Sophie of Hanover (1630-1714), and her daughter ...
Leibniz and the two Sophies [electronic resource] : the philosophical correspondence / ed-ited and translated by Lloyd Strickland. (The other voice in early modern Europe : the Toronto ... Sophie to Leibniz (2 June 1700) 189 36. G. W. Molanus: The soul and its nature (1 or 2 June 1700) 191 37. Leibniz: The soul and its operations (12 June ...
Appearing for the first time in English translation, the philosophical selections cover topics from the nature of substance to universal salvation and evidence the independence of the women’s thought as they defend materialism and challenge Leibniz’s conviction that God created the best possible world.
