Resultado de búsqueda
Jonathan Peter Dancy, né le 8 mai 1946, est un philosophe britannique, travaillant sur des questions d’épistémologie et d’éthique.Actuellement professeur à l'université du Texas à Austin, après avoir travaillé à l’université de Reading. Dancy, après avoir travaillé sur des questions d‘épistémologie et plus particulièrement sur la nature de la perception (l’argument de ...
Jonathan Dancy w Paryżu, 2013 r. Data urodzenia. 8 maja 1946. Strona internetowa. Jonathan Dancy (ur. 8 maja 1946) – brytyjski filozof, zajmujący się etyką oraz epistemologią. Obecnie wykłada na uniwersytecie w Reading (Wielka Brytania) oraz na University of Texas at Austin ( USA ). Jest ojcem aktora Hugh Dancy’ego .
Jonathan Dancy ha tratado de establecer durante más de veinte años los fundamentos de una articulada defensa del particularismo acerca del razonamiento práctico y de la moralidad Puede destacarse, en dicha trayectoria, Moral Reasons, Oxford, Blackwell, 1993.. Su posición se basa en las dos tesis siguientes (p. 7):
Jonathan Dancy maintains that current philosophical orthodoxy bowdlerizes this relation, making it impossible to understand how anyone can act for a good reason. By giving a fresh account of values and reasons, he finds a place for normativity in philosophy of mind and action, and strengthens the connection between these areas and ethics.
Jonathan Dancy is an epistemologist and moral philosopher who argues for moral particularism, the idea that there are no absolute moral principles. There are no invariant reasons that contribute to moral decisions in the very same way no matter what the context of the situation. Reasons are variable, contextual, and dependent on the other ...
6 de jun. de 2001 · Dancy, J., 1983, ‘Ethical Particularism and Morally Relevant Properties’, Mind, 92: 530–47. –––, 1993, Moral Reasons, Oxford: Blackwell. ... Jonathan Dancy Open access to the SEP is made possible by a world-wide funding initiative. The Encyclopedia Now Needs Your Support
28 de mar. de 2018 · Jonathan Dancy, being the contemporary founding father of particularism, provides the most influential, if not the most definitive, statement of the doctrine in Dancy 2009. Väyrynen 2011 offers a balanced analysis of the pros and the cons of particularism, whereas Crisp 1998 takes a somewhat disparaging view about it.
