Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Jonathan Dancy’s philosophical ancestors are Bradley, Wittgenstein and Quine. H e discusses Cartesian scepticism, and even concedes in his last sentence that “scepticism may continue more durable, more seductive and more secure than any reply w e have found so far’’ (p. 241).

  2. Jonathan Dancy is an epistemologist and moral philosopher who argues for moral particularism, the idea that there are no absolute moral principles. There are no invariant reasons that contribute to moral decisions in the very same way no matter what the context of the situation. Reasons are variable, contextual, and dependent on the other ...

  3. 24 de sept. de 2014 · During the last three decades, Jonathan Dancy's work has opened up new avenues in many areas of philosophy. Seven of the fourteen papers in this volume relate in one way or another to Dancy's influential work on particularism in ethics and holism about reasons, and with one exception, they are all largely sympathetic.

  4. 9 de mar. de 2014 · In his SEP article presenting moral particularism, Jonathan Dancy defended particularism against “absolute” and “contributory” moral generalism. Absolute moral generalism claims that a moral principle is “a universal claim to the effect that all actions of a certain type are overall wrong (or right).” On this view of morality, an absolute moral principle might be

  5. ジョナサン・ダンシー. ジョナサン・ピーター・ダンシー (Jonathan Peter Dancy、1946年 5月8日 - )は、英国出身の哲学者。 認識論、倫理学を専門とする。 レディング大学、およびテキサス大学オースティン校の教授。 息子は俳優のヒュー・ダンシー。. 1956年、イギリスのハンプシャー州 ...

  6. 8 de ene. de 1991 · Books. Introduction to Contemporary Epistemology. Jonathan Dancy. Wiley, Jan 8, 1991 - Philosophy - 272 pages. This volume represents the most comprehensive and authoritative collection of canonical readings in theory of knowledge. Concentration on the central topics of the field, it includes many of the most important contributions made in ...

  7. I argue that John Dewey’s analysis of imagination enables an account of learning from imaginary cases consistent with Jonathan Dancy’s moral particularism. Moreover, this account provides a more robust account of learning from cases than Dancy’s own. Particularism is the position that there are no, or at most few, true moral principles, and that competent reasoning and judgment do not ...