Resultado de búsqueda
Federalist No. 70, titled "The Executive Department Further Considered", is an essay written by Alexander Hamilton arguing for a single, robust executive provided for in the United States Constitution.
4 de ene. de 2002 · “The Federalist No. 70, [15 March 1788],” Founders Online, National Archives, https://founders.archives.gov/documents/Hamilton/01-04-02-0221. [Original source: The Papers of Alexander Hamilton , vol. 4, January 1787 – May 1788 , ed. Harold C. Syrett.
Full text of Federalist no. 70. The executive department further considered. From the New York Packet. Tuesday, March 18, 1788. Author: Alexander Hamilton. To the People of the State of New York: THERE is an idea, which is not without its advocates, that a vigorous Executive is inconsistent with the genius of republican government.
Read Hamilton's argument for a strong executive leader in the Constitution, as opposed to a weak one under the Articles of Confederation. Learn how he defended a single executive as safer, more respectable, and more vigilant than a council.
Hamilton argues for a single and energetic executive in a republican government, citing historical examples and reasons. He contrasts the advantages of unity, duration, support, and powers of the executive with the dangers of plurality, dependence, and responsibility.
15 de abr. de 2024 · Federalist Nos. 61-70. Table of Contents. Federalist No. 61 | Federalist No. 62 | Federalist No. 63 | Federalist No. 64 | Federalist No. 65 | Federalist No. 66 | Federalist No. 67 | Federalist No. 68 | Federalist No. 69 | Federalist No. 70. The Same Subject Continued: Concerning the Power of Congress to Regulate the Election of Members.
4 de sept. de 2013 · Hamilton defends the constitutional design of a single executive against its critics who claim it is inconsistent with republican government. He explains the advantages of unity, duration, support, and powers for the executive, and contrasts them with the disadvantages of plurality and dependence.
