Resultado de búsqueda
28 de ago. de 2020 · This paper reviews and discusses a series of convoluted conceptual hurdles that are encountered in connection with the use of digital evidence as part of evidence and proof processes at trial, in contradistinction to investigative uses of such types of evidence.
5 de may. de 2024 · When I wrote about that here, I touched on the issue of uncertainty, pointing to the tactic Freudenberg and colleagues called SCAMs – for “Scientific Certainty” Argumentation Methods. That’s using science’s standards for declaring strong certainty to instil excessive doubt in bodies of evidence.
All science is inherently uncertain. Two key factors that contribute to science’s inherent uncertainty are the complexity of natural phenomena and human limitations.
In the present review, we label the extant literature according to a typology of four types of uncertainty portrayals (deficient, technical, consensus, and scientific; Rice et al., 2018; Gustafson and Rice, 2019), so as to observe any patterns of effects across types.
1 de abr. de 2023 · In order to build a suitable framework, we adopt the approach of risk analysis and discuss three main sources of uncertainty: 1) uncertainty concerning the outcomes; 2) uncertainty concerning the probability of discovery and 3) uncertainty concerning the value of the findings.
21 de jul. de 2022 · Using the uncertainty concept, we present a practical co-designed and dialogical approach supporting the student and teacher journeys towards the transdisciplinary opportunities opened out by technology, based on a cybernetic model of intersubjectivity.
11 de jun. de 2019 · Science is about managing uncertainty. The Framework for K–12 Science Standards (National Research Council, 2012) states: “Scientific knowledge is a particular kind of knowledge with its own sources, justifications, ways of dealing with uncertainties, and agreed-on levels of certainty” (p. 251).
