Resultado de búsqueda
5 de may. de 2024 · Scientific Uncertainty Isn’t a Justification for Getting Things Seriously Wrong. May 5, 2024 Hilda Bastian Evidence Science Communication. The authors got me thinking about the ways scientific uncertainty enables people to lead themselves, and others, astray. That wasn’t what they were writing about.
Two key factors that contribute to science’s inherent uncertainty are the complexity of natural phenomena and human limitations. Although the challenges posed by these two factors can be somewhat mitigated by way of scientific methods of investigation and the use of precise mathematical formulations, neither can be fully done away with.
21 de jul. de 2022 · Evidence for this is presented in a case study from a Russian University Business School where a large group of teachers co-designed and delivered a dialogical module on digitalization and interdisciplinarity over a period of 4 years—a collaboration ended by recent geopolitical events.
Abstract . Uncertainty is inherent to science and science communication. However, the evidence appears mixed regarding whether portraying uncertainty in science communication has positive or negative effects.
1 de abr. de 2023 · In order to build a suitable framework, we adopt the approach of risk analysis and discuss three main sources of uncertainty: 1) uncertainty concerning the outcomes; 2) uncertainty concerning the probability of discovery and 3) uncertainty concerning the value of the findings.
Scientific uncertainty is a quantitative measurement of variability in the data. In other words, uncertainty in science refers to the idea that all data have a range of expected values as opposed to a precise point value. This uncertainty can be categorized in two ways: accuracy and precision.
8 de may. de 2019 · This informs a framework for uncertainty communication in which we identify three objects of uncertainty—facts, numbers and science—and two levels of uncertainty: direct and indirect.
