Resultado de búsqueda
20 de jun. de 2022 · I appreciated that it took the emotional aspect seriously. The Hulk really feels like an out of control curse on Bruce Banner that destroys his old life completely. The MCU Hulk feels very tame in comparison, more like the Looney Tunes Tasmanian Devil. Visually though it's pretty goofy.
8 de jun. de 2024 · I know a lot of people thought the ending of Hulk 2003 was lame, but I love it. It’s the big payoff, where Bruce and Hulk finally work together to defeat their common enemy, and I love the visual symbolism of all the images of child Bruce forming together over Hulk’s face, signifying that child Bruce (aka Hulk) has had enough of his father’s torment, and finally unleashes all of his pain ...
Then they proceed to fight in a lake somewhere. Really blew my mind that I never retained the last 10-20 minutes of the movie. Although, I was a literal baby when I watched it. Reply reply. yourclownprince. •. Your brain was saving you from the Hulk poodle memory. Reply reply. zero_eternal.
29 de sept. de 2021 · It's blunt but also genuinely heartfelt and human, much like the Hulk himself. The presentation the Hulk here is really intense too. He's not the gag machine or audience applause button he's is in the MCU, he's a man with genuine issues. Becoming the Hulk isn't a fun thing that happens when he gets mad, it's a manifestation of trauma and rage.
ADMIN MOD. Hulk 2003 is the best looking Hulk. Unlike his MCU counterpart, he actually looked like the Hulk straight from the comics. And 2003 Hulk could effectively convey a wide range of emotions. Norton’s Hulk was too shredded. Though his was the best interpretation of the character. Ruffalo’s Hulk reminds me of a gorilla.
15 de jun. de 2024 · It was his own Gamma Bomb that turned unleashed The Hulk. In the 2003, it is entirely David's fault. HE was the one who created the Hulk. Not Bruce. Hulk didn't ruin Bruce's life. David did. David is the one who experimented on himself, which led to Bruce being born with the Hulk. David was the one who killed Rebecca Banner.
13 de ene. de 2022 · In conclusion Hulk (2003) is unambiguously canon to Phase 1 of the MCU. I recommend watching it after Iron Man (in place of the 2008 film) and watching The Incredible Hulk after Iron Man 2. The points make for it being canon are solid, but the arguments against it are way too invalidating. TIH definitely relies on the assumption of Hulk’s ...
28 de may. de 2023 · Mostly cause you didn't have to do the annoying banner sneaking missions and hulk killed humans in one punch instead of 3. Plus the movement. The only thing I liked in Hulk (2003 film): It took a while until When I grew up in my 20’s to realize that Hulk (2003 Movie Video Game) was a sequel. the game was fun to play.
The main subreddit for the Indestructible, Immortal, Incredible Hulk! Hulk 2003 was a boring movie, but the ending was badass. You forgot to include the roar at the end. Yes, although all the scenes where Hulk appears are worth it, the worst is the final battle and it is still good.
21 de sept. de 2014 · One simple reason: TIH is in the MCU, 2003's Hulk isn't. Additional points worth considering: Hulk is produced by Universal, TIH is by Marvel Studios. Different origins. Talbot is dead in Hulk, but alive in the MCU. There's no denying that the original script of TIH was written as a sequel to Hulk, but it was rewritten.
