Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Abstract. Whether the result of internal revolution or external factors, in the late sixth century BC Rome underwent regime change. A king, or at least a sole ruler of some sort, was replaced by a governmental system in which power was distributed amongst a wider aristocratic group.

  2. IMPERIUMROMANUM: EMPIRE AND THE LANGUAGE OF POWER*. The vocabulary of empire, as it has developed in European contexts since the period of the Roman empire, reveals clearly enough the significance of the inheritance of Rome for the regimes which have followed it. From Charlemagne to the Tsars, from British imperialism to.

  3. en.wikipedia.org › wiki › AuguryAugury - Wikipedia

    Augury. Augury was a Greco - Roman religion practice of observing the behavior of birds, to receive omens. When the individual, known as the augur, read these signs, it was referred to as "taking the auspices". "Auspices" ( Latin auspicium) means "looking at birds".

  4. AUGUR. AUGUR AUGUR´IUM; AUSPEX, AUSPIC´IUM. Augur or auspex meant a diviner by birds, but came in course of time, like the Greek οἰωνός, to be applied in a more extended sense: his art was called augurium or auspicium. Plutarch relates that the augures were originally termed auspices ( Quaest.

  5. 18 de dic. de 2023 · The privilege, according to Roman tradition, was transferred from the last king to the first Consuls, and ... A disruption in this series in Roman belief would have caused the irreversible end of the auspices: auspicia populi Romani, si ... of the Consuls. In the physical presence of the Dictator, who had more power than ...

  6. When there was no patrician official, the auspices passed into the hands of all patricians (auspicia ad patres redeunt).This was the case during the monarchy, when, after the king’s death, the patricians elected an interim ruler (interrex) and granted him the right to exercise auspices.In this way, he could mediate between the gods and the state in choosing a new king.

  7. The auspicia were further divided, according to the dignity of the magistrate, into maxima ("greatest") and minora ("less"). The greatest auspicia were those which weretaken by the king, dictator, consuls, praetors, and censors; the lesser were taken by aediles and quaestors.