Resultado de búsqueda
4 de ene. de 2002 · J. and A. McLean, The Federalist, II, 290–99, published May 28, 1788, numbered 78. This essay appeared on June 14 in The [New York] Independent Journal: or, the General Advertiser and is numbered 77. In New-York Packet it was begun on June 17 and concluded on June 20 and is numbered 78.
- Introductory Note
The edition of The Federalist published by Jacob Gideon in...
- The Federalist No. 22
The Federalist No. 221 [New York, December 14, 1787] To the...
- Nhprc
Latest News NHPRC to award $4 million in grants for access...
- Introductory Note
Hamilton argued that the judiciary was the least dangerous branch of the government and that it had the power to review the constitutionality of laws and actions. He claimed that the courts were the bulwarks of a limited Constitution against legislative encroachments and that the people's will was superior to the legislature.
Federalist No. 78 describes the process of judicial review, in which the federal courts review statutes to determine whether they are consistent with the Constitution and its statutes. Federalist No. 78 indicates that under the Constitution, the legislature is not the judge of the constitutionality of its own actions.
Federalist No. 78 describe el proceso de revisión judicial, en el cual los tribunales federales revisan los estatutos para determinar si son consistentes con la Constitución y sus estatutos.
Hamilton argues for an independent judiciary with permanent tenure and lifetime appointments to protect the Constitution from encroachments by the legislature. He claims that the judiciary is the weakest and most impartial branch of government, and that its role is to declare unconstitutional laws void.
Federalist No. 78 es un ensayo de Alexander Hamilton, el septuagésimo octavo de The Federalist Papers. Como todos los artículos de The Federalist, fue publicado utilizando el seudónimo Publius.
Hamilton argues for a federal judiciary with independence, permanence, and authority to declare unconstitutional laws void. He explains the importance of judicial review in a limited Constitution and the danger of legislative supremacy.
