Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Sir Julian Bernard Knowles (born 26 January 1969) [1] is a British High Court judge. Educational and early life. Knowles was born in Manchester and lived in Wythenshawe council estate. He was educated at comprehensives St John Plessington High School and Xaverian College.

  2. 6 de mar. de 2024 · Now High Court judge Mr Justice Julian Knowles has ruled that decision was "irrational" and based on "plainly faulty" reasoning as the Afghan judge's activities "personally and directly" had...

  3. Julian Knowles is an Australian composer and performer, specialising in new and emerging technologies. His creative work spans the fields of composition for theatre, dance, film and television, electronic music, sound and new media arts, popular music and record production.

  4. The Honourable Mr Justice Julian Knowles: Introduction 1. In his unpublished introduction to Animal Farm (1945) George Orwell wrote: “If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear.” 2. In R v Central Independent Television plc [1994] Fam 192, 202-203, Hoffmann LJ said that:

  5. As a barrister, Julian Knowles has been at the forefront of the fight against the death penalty worldwide for years. He has been involved in many of the leading death penalty cases – in the Privy Council and the Caribbean Courts of Appeal – as well as working on death row cases in Oklahoma and Florida

  6. Court: Mr Justice Julian Knowles. Background to the case. 1. Between November 2018 and January 2019 the Claimant, Harry Miller, posted a number of tweets on Twitter about transgender issues. He holds gender critical views. The Claimant strongly denies being prejudiced against transgender people.

  7. 28 de jun. de 2022 · Julian Knowles J. allowed the defendant’s appeal on fundamental dishonesty and dismissed the claim. He restated his previously expressed view in LOCOG v Sinfield [2018] EWHC 51 (QB) that loss of genuine or honest damages cannot, alone, amount to “substantial injustice” for the purposes of the proviso to s.57(2).