Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Hace 23 horas · Justice Brett Kavanaugh is working on a legal memoir at a time when the Supreme Court is being increasingly scrutinized amid falling public trust.. Why it matters: Kavanaugh, 59, has been relatively quiet amid a host of controversies.Now he's expected to give his point of view on everything from the fracas over his 2018 confirmation to the 2022 plot to kill him, a source familiar with the ...

  2. Hace 8 horas · “The extra federal money that the Court today green-lights does not come free,” Justice Brett Kavanaugh wrote in the dissent, which was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett. “In my view, the court should leave those difficult appropriations decisions and tradeoffs to Congress.”

  3. Hace 4 días · In the Florida case, three conservative justices — John Roberts, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett — voted with liberal Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson to ...

  4. Hace 2 horas · Justice Brett Kavanaugh Plans Memoir. “Justice Brett Kavanaugh is working on a legal memoir at a time when the Supreme Court is being increasingly scrutinized amid falling public trust,” Axios reports. “Kavanaugh, 59, has been relatively quiet amid a host of controversies. Now he’s expected to give his point of view on everything from ...

  5. Hace 23 horas · Justice Brett Kavanaugh, who wrote a dissenting opinion that was joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Amy Coney Barrett, complained that the court’s decision “could cost between $800 million and $2 billion.”

  6. Hace 23 horas · Justice Brett Kavanaugh, in a dissenting opinion joined by Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Amy Coney Barrett, wrote that “the extra federal money that the Court today green-lights does not come free.” “The court should leave those difficult appropriations decisions and tradeoffs to Congress,” he wrote.

  7. Hace 4 horas · Justice Brett Kavanaugh, joined by the other three conservative justices, dissented. He said the majority ruling "upends" 30 years of practice, which Congress could have addressed but chose not to.