Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks Eliezer Yudkowsky (yudkowsky@singinst.org) Forthcoming in Global Catastrophic Risks, eds. Nick Bostrom and Milan Cirkovic Draft of August 31, 2006. Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence Palo Alto, CA Introduction

  2. www.cato-unbound.org › contributors › eliezer-yudkowskyEliezer Yudkowsky | Cato Unbound

    Eliezer Yudkowsky is a research fellow at the Singularity Institute, where he researches Friendly AI and recursive self-improvement. In 2001, he published Creating Friendly AI: The Analysis and Design of Benevolent Goal Architectures.He is the author of the papers “Cognitive Biases Potentially Affecting Judgment of Global Risks” and “AI as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk ...

  3. O meu outro capítulo de Global Catastrophic Risks, "Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks", foi aberto com uma observação que poucas pessoas escolheriam deliberadamente destruir o planeta em que vivemos; mas um cenário em que a destruição ocorre por um erro, ou seja, sem dolo, é realmente preocupante. Poucas pessoas

  4. 27 de mar. de 2013 · Existential risk is a concept that can focus long-term global efforts and sustainability concerns. • The biggest existential risks are anthropogenic and related to potential future technologies. • A moral case can be made that existential risk reduction is strictly more important than any other global public good. •

  5. 24 de oct. de 2023 · Confirmation bias, hindsight bias, mere exposure effect, self-serving bias, base rate fallacy, anchoring bias, availability bias, the framing effect , inattentional blindness, and the ecological fallacy are some of the most common examples of cognitive bias. Another example is the false consensus effect. Cognitive biases directly affect our ...

  6. Cognitive biases potentially affecting judgment of global risks. yudkowsky@singinst.org . Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence . Palo Alto, ...

  7. All else being equal, not many people would prefer to destroy the world. Even faceless corporations, meddling governments, reckless scientists, and other agents of doom, require a world in which to achieve their goals of profit, order, tenure, or other villainies.