Resultado de búsqueda
The Nature of the Firm. R. H. Coase. First published: November 1937. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x. Citations: 12,312. Sections. PDF. Tools. Share. E conomic theory has suffered in the past from a failure to state clearly its assumptions.
« La naturaleza de la empresa » (1937) es un artículo de Ronald Coase en el que se ofrece una explicación económica de por qué los individuos eligen formar sociedades, empresas y otras entidades comerciales en lugar de comerciar bilateralmente a través de contratos en un mercado.
The Nature of the Firm" (1937) is an article by Ronald Coase. It offered an economic explanation of why individuals choose to form partnerships, companies, and other business entities rather than trading bilaterally through contracts on a market. The author was awarded the Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences in 1991 in part due ...
23 de may. de 1991 · In 1937, Ronald H. Coase published The Nature of the Firm, a classic paper that raised fundamental questions about the concept of the firm in economic theory. Coase proposed that the comparative costs of organizing transactions through markets, rather than within firms, are the primary determinants of the size and scope of firms.
Libro. Fecha de publicación: 1997. Revista descriptores: Formas de la competencia entre grandes empresas. Relaciones de propiedad y control: empresas sin nacionalidad versus internacionalización del capital. Tema: Desarrollo de los fundamentos teóricos de la concepción “firma” en la teoría económica. Idea principal:
In his 1937 study, “The Nature of the Firm,” a then-26-year-old Coase posed two questions: Why are there organizations of the type represented by firms, and why is each firm of a certain size?
2. The Nature of the Firm: Meaning. R. H. COASE. University of Chicago. The solution to the puzzles that I took with me to America was, as it turned out, very simple. All that was needed was to recognize that there were of carrying out market transactions and to incorporate them into the something which economists had failed to do.
