Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 7 de nov. de 2014 · “Richard Musgrave y James Buchanan son ambos padres de importantes campos en la economía. Richard Musgrave estableció los fundamentos de la economía pública de posguerra, y James Buchanan fue el principal fundador de la escuela de Elección Pública (Public Choice).

  2. Richard A. Musgrave, a founder of modern public finance, points to market failures and inequities that call for corrective public policies. They apply their differing economic and political philosophies to a variety of key issues. Each presentation is followed by a response and general discussion.

  3. The book’s discussion points to two different sources of their differing views. First, as Buchanan (p. 88) points out, Musgrave places more trust in the state than Buchanan. Second, Buchanan and Musgrave have two different visions of the functions of the state.

  4. 29 de jul. de 2014 · This paper assesses James M. Buchanan's claim of following a positive approach in stark contrast to the normative approach to public finance of Richard A. Musgrave. The goal of this paper is to shed light on the foundations of modern American public finance by analysing one aspect of the methodology of its two most prominent fathers.

  5. Richard Musgrave, public finance, and public choice* JAMES M. BUCHANAN Center for Study of Public Choice, George Mason University, Fairfax, VA 22030 The two volumes under review allow us to look at the half-century's scholar-ship of the leading public finance economist of that half-century. The papers

  6. 12 de oct. de 1999 · This paper assesses James M. Buchanan's claim of following a positive approach in stark contrast to the normative approach to public finance of Richard A. Musgrave. The goal of this paper is to shed …

  7. James Buchanan and Gordon Tullock were the first to discuss what had been the traditional domain of political scientists within the realm of economic theory. They did so by considering government decisionmaking not as a monolith, but rather as representing a spectrum of interests.