Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 20 de jul. de 2021 · Throughout the pandemic, uncertainty has been inherent in a wide range of areas, from virus behaviors to immunology to health care systems. Scientists deal with uncertainty as they collect granular and disaggregated data to model the epidemiologic transition.

  2. 1 de oct. de 2023 · Our participants clearly identified that scientific uncertainty is not just about the science, or the influences on science, but also about the broader landscape on which science is conducted and communicated. For example, this includes the scientific outcomes and objectives and resulting impacts upon decisions.

  3. 20 de jul. de 2021 · Home. Science & Education. Article. Is Uncertainty a Barrier or Resource to Advance Science? The Role of Uncertainty in Science and Its Implications for Science Teaching and Learning. Kostas Kampourakis, Kevin McCain (2019): Uncertainty: How It Makes Science Advance. Oxford University Press, New York, NY.

  4. 1 de abr. de 2023 · This discussion often occurs in the absence of well-defined and developed concepts of what uncertainty and risk-taking mean in science, how these can be measured and incorporated into peer review. 1 In order to address this void, we first outline a framework to characterize risk in science, drawing on the rich and diverse literature on risk and ...

  5. 28 de ago. de 2020 · Within a broader perspective, Horsman’s diagnosis that the field of digital forensic science ‘‘diverges from other forensic-sub disciplines [sic]’’ [p. 2] and, in effect, digital evidence practitioners do not need to quantify their uncertainty, can be seen as a form of intellectual exceptionalism.

  6. 24 de oct. de 2019 · Uncertainty does not mean that we cannot know anything, that all views are equally valid, that all scientific evidence should be questioned, or that important socio-scientific decisions cannot be made.

  7. 5 de may. de 2024 · When I wrote about that here, I touched on the issue of uncertainty, pointing to the tactic Freudenberg and colleagues called SCAMs – for “Scientific Certainty” Argumentation Methods. That’s using sciences standards for declaring strong certainty to instil excessive doubt in bodies of evidence.