Resultado de búsqueda
Findings (pursuant to this research misconduct procedure) of serious academic deficiencies in proposing, conducting or reporting research - but not constituting research misconduct - are to be addressed by the cognizant dean, or by initiating the relevant disciplinary process, as appropriate.
If the inquiry substantiates academic misconduct that is admitted by the respondent, the dean will determine what actions should be taken, including any further investigation, and the sanctions to be imposed or recommended, consistent with applicable disciplinary procedures and with the approval of the provost.
In the case of students implicated in an inquiry into misconduct, the outcome of fact-finding and the Dean’s finding that allegations are substantiated, shall be reported to the discipline committee (or its equivalent) of the School in which the student is enrolled.
The inquiry should be initiated promptly after written allegations or other evidence of possible academic misconduct become known and are brought to the attention of the Vice President for Research and Dean for Graduate Education.
To constitute academic misconduct under this policy, the alleged behavior must represent a significant departure from the accepted practices of the relevant research or scholarly community and must be shown to have been committed intentionally, knowingly, or recklessly.
The process for investigation and determination of cases of academic misconduct are found in Section 9.5 of the APPM. The process for formal inquiry is found in Section 9.6 of the APPM. The TIU’s Academic Integrity Officer’s Flowchart presents a simplified view of these processes.
8 de feb. de 2024 · Student Academic Performance, Academic Conduct, and Professional and Ethical Conduct processes are included in Policy 6-410. Reports of Discrimination or Sexual Misconduct are handled through the Office of Equal Opportunity and Affirmative Action in accordance with Policy and Procedures 5-210 .
