Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

  1. Anuncio

    relacionado con: Yoshimi Takeuchi
  2. Read Customer Reviews & Find Best Sellers. Free, Easy Returns On Millions Of Items. Discover a Wide Selection Of Books Suitable For Every Reader's Taste. Shop Now.

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Yoshimi Takeuchi was a Sinologist, a cultural critic and translator. He studied Chinese author Lu Xun and translated Lu’s works into Japanese. His book-length study, Lu Xun (1944) ignited a significant reaction in the world of Japanese thought during and after the Pacific War.

  2. 27 de jun. de 2024 · Literary Critic and Sinologist, Takeuchi Yoshimi, provides post-colonial and decolonial studies a logic of resistance that seeks to destabilize the colonialist projects of Western modernity without repeating its structural logic.

  3. 15 de dic. de 2017 · It contextualizes the influential works on Asianism by the Japanese Sinologist Takeuchi Yoshimi (1910–1977) who has been the inspiration for the recent surge in studies of Asian self-affirmation in China, Japan, and Korea as well as in the West.

  4. 9 de oct. de 2023 · Takeuchi Yoshimi was “irreverent” and a “rebel” sinologist – he comes off that way in Ro Jin in terms of being the first to suspect that there was something wrong in Lu Xun’s narration of the significance of the “lantern-slide incident,” to say that his “memoirs” have been fictionalized to a certain extent and in ...

  5. Takeuchi Yoshimi is remembered today in Japan as one of the leading intellectuals of the postwar period in his dual capacity as China scholar and literary and social critic.

  6. 1 de oct. de 2019 · In 1960 Japanese scholar of Chinese literature Takeuchi Yoshimi gave a pair of lectures titled “Asia as Method,” in which he considered how one might engage with Western theory from an East Asian perspective.

  7. 7 de mar. de 2012 · Based on the present author's Asia as Method—toward De-Imperialization (2010) as a point of dialogue, this essay rereads Takeuchi's intuitive formulation of ‘Asia as Method’ in the 1960 and tries to pinpoint different characteristics of knowledge conditions between now and then.