Resultado de búsqueda
10 de dic. de 2020 · In Philosophical Fragments the pseudonymous author Johannes Climacus explored the question: What is required in order to go beyond Socratic recollection of eternal ideas already possessed by the learner?
In the Postscript Johannes Climacus argued that ethics are absent in Hegel's philosophy and also in the fragments on ethical communication we find an allusion to
This chapter offers a reading of Søren Kierkegaard's philosophical work Concluding Unscientific Postscript to ‘Philosophical Fragments’ to illuminate his ideas about ‘the eternal’ and its Paradox.
Concluding Unscientific Postscript to the Philosophical Fragments (Danish: Afsluttende uvidenskabelig Efterskrift til de philosophiske Smuler) is a major work by Søren Kierkegaard. The work is an attack against Hegelianism, the philosophy of Hegel, and especially Hegel's Science of Logic.
In the Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Soren Kierkegaard offers an argument which suggests that adopting a certain tradi- tional picture of rationality as a way of life, as an ideal that you try to live
Based on the definitive English edition of Kierkegaard's works by Princeton University Press, this series of commentaries addresses all the published texts of the influential Danish philosopher...
Søren Kierkegaard’s Concluding Unscientific Postscript (1846) is an inquiry into the subjectivity of truth, and into the truth of subjectivity. Kierkegaard explains how objective truth may differ from subjective truth, and how objectivity differs from subjectivity.
