Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 10 de ene. de 2002 · In a government, where numerous and extensive prerogatives are placed in the hands of a hereditary monarch, the executive department is very justly regarded as the source of danger, and watched with all the jealousy which a zeal for liberty ought to inspire.

  2. Federalist No. 48 is an essay by James Madison, the forty-eighth of the Federalist Papers. It was first published by The New York Packet on February 1, 1788, under the pseudonym Publius, the name under which all the Federalist Papers were published. This paper builds on Federalist No. 47.

  3. An ELECTIVE DESPOTISM was not the government we fought for; but one which should not only be founded on free principles, but in which the powers of government should be so divided and balanced among several bodies of magistracy, as that no one could transcend their legal limits, without being effectually checked and restrained by the others.

  4. It is agreed that no department should have overruling power over another. But as power tends to desire increase, restraints must be installed to avoid de facto encroachments of one branch on another.

  5. 25 de abr. de 2024 · Under the FIRST view of the subject, two important questions arise: 1. Whether any part of the powers transferred to the general government be unnecessary or improper? 2. Whether the entire mass of them be dangerous to the portion of jurisdiction left in the several States?

  6. 20 de dic. de 2021 · FEDERALIST No. 48. These Departments Should Not Be So Far Separated as to Have No Constitutional Control Over Each Other. FEDERALIST No. 49 ... FEDERALIST No. 13. Advantage of the Union in Respect to Economy in Government For the Independent Journal. Wednesday, November 28, 1787 ...

  7. According to Federalist 51, partially blending the powers of government would create a system of checks and balances whereby each branch was given the “constitutional means” and “requisite motives” to keep the other branches from breaching the boundaries of their power: “Ambition must be made to counteract ambition.”.