Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. 5 de ene. de 2021 · During the 20th century, dialectics was applied in many philosophical and scientific disciplines. The remarkable use of the dialectical method occurred, for example, in Marxism but also in structuralism, which was developed in the 1920s by the Prague Linguistic Circle. The study focuses on the works of the Czech literary scholar and aesthetician Jan Mukařovský (1891–1975).

  2. 2. Jan Mukařovský and Roman Jakobson We are not able to determine the exact day and place of the first meeting of Jan Mukařovský and Roman Jakobson. It is documented that Roman Jakobson met with the later chair-man of the Prague Linguistic Circle, Vilém Mathesius, already in September 1920. The Prague Linguistic Circle was founded in ...

  3. Para ello se dieron a la tarea de traducir directamente del checo veinte escritos de quien fuera el verdadero adalid de la Escuela, Jan Mukařovskỳ. Con su llegada al Círculo, los intereses del grupo se vieron ampliados, al comenzar a aplicar el enfoque estructuralista más allá del lenguaje, a la literatura en general, a las artes y al teatro.

  4. 16 de dic. de 2014 · Aesthetic Function, Norm and Value as Social Facts (Excerpts) Jan Mukařovský. Philosophy, Sociology. 4 May 2015. Abstract Mukařovský’s concern is the function, survival, and development of what he calls the “aesthetic function,” extending his investigation beyond art alone to consider the constantly changing…. Expand.

  5. 穆卡洛夫斯基 (1891~1975),布拉格结构主义学派中最重要的理论家之一,被认为是俄国形式主义的传统的继承者。. 在德国影响非常大,人们提到接受理论或 结构主义理论 ,几乎言必称穆卡洛夫斯基。. 穆卡洛夫斯基 (1891~1975),布拉格结构主义学派中最重要的 ...

  6. 19 de nov. de 2023 · Jan Mukařovský, ed. and trans. John Burbank and Peter Steiner (New Ha ven, CT: Yale. University Press, 1978), 82−88. Mukařovský drew not only on linguistics and Russian formalism 7 but also on.

  7. 02 2014 Jan Mukařovský’s Intentionality-Unintentionality in Art: from Structuralism to Affect In his 1988 study, “Mukařovský’s Aesthetic Object”, John Fizer has clearly outlined the diference between the Prague School’s view of the aesthetic object and a later semiotic renderings of it,3 stating that “Mukařovský’s view of the spatio-temporal accidentality of the subject in ...