Resultado de búsqueda
In precise, traditional usage, an “eponym” is someone or something that gives its name to something else. So “eponymous” describes the giver of the name, NOT the receiver.
20 de dic. de 2020 · When it started to be built.... (1) and (2) are input and output of the syntactic rule of To be -deletion. There's no difference in meaning, and they're both grammatical, since it's largely an optional rule. (3) and (4) are hopeless, though (4) is not totally ungrammatical.
When the clause begins with a subordinating word, it is no longer an independent clause; it is called a dependent or subordinate clause because it depends on something else (the independent clause) for its meaning.
1 de ago. de 2016 · 1/17. This 18th-century structure stood on farmland in Ontario before Ellen Denisevich-Grickis had it relocated to her four-acre plot in Rhode Island. The contemporary-style kitchen sports floors...
Both sentences are correct and have essentially the same meaning. However the first sentence. Robots are too complex to be built. Has greater emphasis on being not buildable. Robots are too complex to be built (ever, by anyone). Robots are too complex to build. Could also mean the same as to be built, but can also mean.
Question about English (US). 'The building used to be here.' is correct? See a translation
Is there a term to describe something that has been added to over time, as opposed to created all at once? Something made up of unplanned expansions? For example, an old building like a house or church that has had various extensions over a long period of time.
