Resultado de búsqueda
18 de sept. de 2017 · 1. He has no brother or sister. He’s an only child. 2. He has no brothers or sisters. He’s an only child. I wonder if both 1 and 2 are correct. If so, which sentence is more common? Many thanks in advance.
no brothers and no sisters is not equivalent to no brother and sisters. "Henry had no brothers and no sisters" is clear. It means "Henry was an only child." A shorter way to express it with equal clarity would be, "Henry had no brothers or sisters." "Henry had no brother and sisters" causes a problem because brother is singular and sisters is
17 de ene. de 2021 · 1 Answer. Sorted by: 1. You are right that any adds emphasis to the fact of not having siblings, and would be more commonly used standing alone. For instance as in a simple factual reply in a conversation.
Definition: a child who has no sisters or brothers. As for using "the only child", I don't see why it would be considered incorrect. In a different context, one might say "the only jar on the shelf". Your version of the phrase is grammatical, but the compound noun above is the one people may be expecting in that given context.
Traduce has no brothers or sisters. Ver traducciones en inglés y español con pronunciaciones de audio, ejemplos y traducciones palabra por palabra.
1 de nov. de 2023 · M. José. Aquí mi respuesta: Sí, exactamente. Siblings se refiere a hermanos y hermanas en conjunto, lo que pasa es que no es una palabra muy común. La plaza Dos de Mayo, aquí en Madrid. Foto del autor. Lo más común, efectivamente, es decir “brothers and sisters” sin más, para referirte a los dos géneros. Entonces tenemos…
sisters. QUICK ANSWER. "Sisters" is a form of "sister", a noun which is often translated as "la hermana". "I have no brothers" is a phrase which is often translated as "no tengo hermanos". Learn more about the difference between "I have no brothers" and "sisters" below. I have no brothers(. ay.
