Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

  1. Anuncio

    relacionado con: the great eskimo vocabulary hoax

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Among all the hundreds of people making published contributions to the great Eskimo vocabulary hoax, no one had acquired any evidence about how long the purported list of snow terms really was, or what words were on it, or what criteria were used in deciding what to put on the list.

  2. article, "The Great Eskimo Vocabulary Hoax," purporting to. debunk a myth regarding the number of words Eskimos. have for snow. It just so happened that I, - many years ago, of course, you understand - well, that I passed along such a.

  3. How reliable are all those stories about the number of Eskimo words for snow? How can lamps, flags, and parrots be libelous? How might Star Trek’s Commander Spock react to Noam Chomsky’s theories of language?

  4. To an Eskimo, this all-inclusive word would bealmost unthinkable; he would say that falling snow, slushy snow, and so on, are sensuously and operationally different, different. THEGREAT ESKIMO VOCABULARY HOAX 277. things to contend with; he uses different words. forthem (Whorf 1940; inCarroll 1956, 216).

  5. 1 de ene. de 2006 · Many of its 'facts' turn out to be of the same nature as the 'fact' that the Eskimos know dozens of words for snow: stories repeated so often that no one cares to check their origin and...

  6. 9 de jul. de 1991 · Among the unusual encounters in store are a conversation between Star Trek's Commander Spock and three real earth linguists, the strange tale of the author's imprisonment for embezzling funds from the Campaign for Typographical Freedom, a harrowing account of a day in the research life of four unhappy grammarians, and the true story of how a mon...

  7. 22 de sept. de 1993 · 1. A Pragmatic and Philosophical Examination of Everett’s Claims About Pirahã. Anne Reboul. Philosophy. 2017. This paper discusses Everett’s (Curr Anthropol 46 (4):621–646, 2005) claim that Piraha lacks words for the existential and the universal quantifiers. Everett bases his argument on his analysis of the