Resultado de búsqueda
12 de jun. de 2014 · If there are objective moral obligations, there is a God who explains these obligations. There is a God. This argument is stated in a deductive form, but it can easily be reworded as a probabilistic “argument to the best explanation,” as follows: There are objective moral obligations. God provides the best explanation of the existence of ...
comprehensive case for the existence of God based on the evidence of intelligent design in the universe. Through his meticulous analysis of the fine-tuning argument, the nature of DNA, the complexity of biological systems, and the irreducibility of consciousness, Flew demonstrates the rational and plausible nature of his conclusion.
If God exists, one question would be whether they would be bound to the laws of sciences such as physics (Credit: Alamy) Things get a bit more interesting when you consider how far light has ...
If there is a God, He is infinitely incomprehensible, since, having neither parts nor limits, He has no affinity to us. We are then incapable of knowing either what He is or if He is.... ..."God is, or He is not." But to which side shall we incline? Reason can decide nothing here. There is infinite chaos that separated us.
It is most improbable that there is a scientific explanation (e.g., a Darwinian explanation) of the evolution of souls. But since it is probable that God brings about humans, it is probable that he brings about their essential parts — souls. Keywords: Darwinism, mental properties, souls.
4 de nov. de 2008 · In There Is a God, Flew discusses the philosophical and scientific findings that turned him from a staunch atheist into a believer–providing a riveting analysis of the influential arguments of such luminaries as Charles Darwin, Stephen Hawking, Bertrand Russell, Richard Dawkins, and Francis Collins–and he comments on such issues as evolution, in...
1. Introduction: The Non-Empirical Nature of the Ontological Arguments. It is worth reflecting for a moment on what a remarkable (and beautiful!) undertaking it is to deduce God’s existence from the very definition of God. Normally, existential claims don’t follow from conceptual claims.
