Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Ahmad Sirhindi (1564 – 1624/1625) was an Islamic scholar, Hanafi jurist, and member of the Naqshbandī Sufi order who lived during the era of Mughal Empire. Ahmad Sirhindi opposed heterodox movements within the Mughal court such as Din-i Ilahi, in support of more orthodox forms of Islamic Law.

  2. Ahmad Sirhindi. 26 de junio de 1564 jul. Aḥmad Sirhindī (1564, Sirhind, Patiala - 1624, Sirhind, India) fue un teólogo y asceta indio, responsable del reavivamiento del sunismo en la India. Después de recibir una educación tradicional musulmana, se unió a una importante organización sufi y se dedicó a predicar en contra de las ...

  3. 9 de abr. de 2024 · Islam. mysticism. Shaykh Aḥmad Sirhindī (born 1564?, Sirhind, Patiāla, India—died 1624, Sirhind) was an Indian mystic and theologian who was largely responsible for the reassertion and revival in India of orthodox Sunnite Islam as a reaction against the syncretistic religious tendencies prevalent during the reign of the Mughal ...

  4. 8 de ago. de 2023 · Ahmad Sirhindi was a largely influential Islamic scholar and Sufi who lived during the Mughal Empire in India. He focused on making Islamic practices pure and strong, and he stressed the importance of following religious rules and being devoted to spirituality.

  5. filósofo indio / De Wikipedia, la enciclopedia encyclopedia. Aḥmad Sirhindī (1564, Sirhind, Patiala - 1624, Sirhind, India) fue un teólogo y asceta indio, responsable del reavivamiento del sunismo en la India. Datos rápidos Información personal, Nacimiento ... Cerrar.

  6. SIRHINDI, SHAYKH AHMAD (1564–1624) Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindi was born in Sirhind, a small town located two hundred kilometers northwest of Delhi. The head of a Sufi lodge as well as a competent religious scholar, he was initiated into three Sufi lineages: the Chishtiyya, the Qadiriyya, and the Suhrawardiyya.

  7. Shaykh Ahmad Sirhindl subjected the doctrine of wahdat al-wujud to a detailed criticism, both on rational and scriptural grounds. Like Simnanl, he also pointed out that the experience of union or oneness is only a stage in the journey of the sufi, not the end. He should continue his march, go beyond that stage, realize the transcendence of God, and