Resultado de búsqueda
2 de may. de 2019 · Philip Waage reviews Richard Foley's book that compares and contrasts the sciences and humanities based on his experience as a dean of arts and science. He praises Foley's attempt to overcome the two cultures divide and to map an intellectual landscape for a common research culture.
Philip Waage reviews Richard Foley's book that compares and contrasts the sciences and humanities based on his experience as a dean of arts and science. He praises Foley's attempt to overcome the two cultures divide and to map an intellectual landscape for a common research culture.
Richard Foley is former Anne and Joel Ehrenkranz Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Science and Vice-Chancellor for Strategic Planning at New York University. Previously he was chair of the Department of Philosophy, Executive Dean of Arts and Science, and Dean of the Graduate School at Rutgers University, and prior to that, chair of the Department ...
Paul Moser reviews Foley's book on the conditions and principles of epistemic rationality, a subjective foundationalist view based on Aristotelian conception of rationality. Moser critiques Foley's theory for its reliance on circularity and subjectivity.
Richard Foley' s sequel to The Theory of Epistemic Rationality1 places the theory he developed there into the framework of a general theory of rationality. This framework provides a unified way of thinking about both rational action and rational belief. Foley focuses here as before on rational belief: in particular, epi- stemically rational belief.
Richard Foley - 1987 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press. Working without a net: a study of egocentric epistemology. Richard Foley - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press. In this new book, Foley defends an epistemology that takes seriously the perspectives of individual thinkers.
Professor of Philosophy; former Dean of the Faculty of Arts and Science and Vice-Chancellor for Strategic Planning, New York University.
