Yahoo Search Búsqueda en la Web

Resultado de búsqueda

  1. Aquinas on Mind By Anthony Kenny London:Routledge, 1993, viii+182pp., £30.00 - Volume 69 Issue 268 Skip to main content Accessibility help We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites.

  2. 2 de dic. de 2005 · 1. Interpretations and method. Aquinas’ moral and political philosophy has to be reconstructed from his theological treatises and commentaries and his commentaries on Aristotle’s Nicomachean Ethics and the first two and half books of Aristotle’s Politics. Its proper interpretation has been a matter of some difficulty from the time of his death in 1274.

  3. Aquinas more typically follows the practice of many medieval Aristotelians and employs these terms generically in order to capture some combination of the powers of imagination, cogitation, and memory.10 It is important to keep these points in mind when examining a particular passage from Aquinas.11 The questions we must keep in mind are: What level of analysis is his investigation working on?

  4. Kenny and Aquinas on the Metaphysics of Mind John Haldane. In John Cottingham & Peter Hacker (eds.), Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny. Oxford University Press (2010)

  5. 3 de feb. de 2017 · Although Lisska does an effective job in showing how Aquinas's position on perception avoids the kind of representationalism ('theater of the mind' view) that leads to epistemological problems and away from realism, I believe that there are some other worries based on Lisska's interpretation that might create problems for a thorough-going realist position.

  6. Kenny and Aquinas on the Metaphysics of Mind. John Haldane - 2010 - In John Cottingham & Peter Hacker (eds.), Mind, Method, and Morality: Essays in Honour of Anthony Kenny.Oxford University Press.

  7. John Jalsevac - 2023 - Dialogue 62 (3):475-489. In the Summa Theologiae, Thomas Aquinas states that the “aspect of pastness” involved in memory is a certain kind of cognitive object — i.e., an intention — apprehended by the “estimative power.”. All told, however, Aquinas mentions this idea precisely once.